← All articles

Self-Steering Before Laloux:
What a 2000 German Professional Book Contained

By Dr.-Ing. Walter Tritt · Evidence from his own 2000 professional book · KVD Service Management Award 1992

The idea and its famous messengers

Anyone dealing with self-organization in companies today sooner or later encounters two names: Frederic Laloux, who made the Teal organization popular with "Reinventing Organizations" (2014) - self-managing teams instead of hierarchies, trust instead of control. And Daniel Pink, who demonstrated with "Drive" (2009) what motivation research had shown for decades: people work best out of autonomy, mastery and purpose - not out of external pressure.

Neither invented these ideas - Laloux himself points back to a long tradition. But they became famous through them. What hardly anyone knows: The same thoughts were already written in the year 2000 in a German professional book - not as theory, but from the practice of an engineer who bore leadership responsibility at Siemens for over 15 years, last for 120 employees, and who received the first German Service Management Award (KVD) in 1992 for his model.

This article presents the original passages. Not to claim that anyone copied anyone - but to show: The future of organizations was thought earlier than its fame suggests. And it was thought by a practitioner who tested it.

1. The neural organization - Teal before Teal

In the chapter "Structures, Organizations, Systems" the 2000 book describes an organizational form it calls the "neural organization": autonomous, specialized segments that jointly take care of customers - without central assignment.

The core features in the original (chapter "Strukturen, Unternehmen/Organisationen, Systeme" from p. 253, section "Idee einer neuronalen Organisation" from p. 279):

• Autonomous segments: Each segment delivers its services on its own responsibility - sales, dispatch, warehousing, repair work together in a networked structure for the customer.
• Freely chosen control: Each segment cooperates with a mutually freely selectable control segment. Several competing control segments exist - quality assurance as a service, not as a surveillance department.
• Few, simple rules: Instead of thick manuals, a small set of accepted rules by which the segments order themselves.
• Cell division instead of reorganization: When a segment reaches its capacity limit, it divides - like a cell. Bottlenecks trigger growth, not bureaucracy.

Fourteen years before Laloux systematically described self-management and "evolutionary" structures - here, in a German service book, already as a consistent structural model.

2. Motivation without pressure - Drive before Drive

The personnel part of the book (chapter "Mitarbeiter im Service und im Dienstleistungsgeschaeft", from p. 149) reads today like an anticipation of modern motivation research. Original quotes (translated from German):

And on appraisal systems, nine years before Pink wrote about autonomy:

The book concludes with a principle discussed today as "intrinsic motivation": organizations should promote independence, honesty and self-determination - then top performance emerges on its own.

3. The service exchange - the practical proof

What Laloux and Pink describe as an attitude, the 2000 book worked out as a functioning control instrument: the service exchange (chapter "Personaldisposition" from p. 192, section "Disposition über eine Auftragsbörse" from p. 195). The core of the model, awarded the German Service Management Prize in 1992:

• Every reported fault receives a value via a rating matrix - depending on urgency, difficulty, customer importance.
• Unclaimed orders rise in value until someone takes them - dynamic prices like on an exchange.
• Specialists choose their orders themselves. Priority is no longer set by a dispatcher, but by the interplay of order value and self-interest.
• The result is objectively comparable: "favoritism or mobbing seems excluded" (chapter "Bewertung von Aufträgen", from p. 206).

The book's most famous sentence stands exactly there: "Market economies work, planned economies do not." (chapter "Argumente für eine Börsendisposition", from p. 197) - as the reason why more market economy must be dared within companies.

4. The analytical foundation: logistics and cost chains

The practitioner's reputation rests not only on organizational visions but on measurable analyses. The second part of the book (chapter "Materialdisposition", from p. 211) dissects spare parts supply into cost chains and sums them up stage by stage - from the manufacturer's warehouse via central, regional and sales warehouses to the technician's car trunk:

Also a sharp diagnostic look at administrations: "An estimated 70 % of administrative activities performed are probably superfluous" (chapter "Verwaltungstätigkeiten", from p. 259) - and: systems must be "shaken up" regularly, or they wither. Both sound as current as a management blog from yesterday. They are from 2000.

The timeline in comparison

Year	Work	Core idea
1992	Tritt: service exchange model (KVD Award)	Market economy inside the company, self-dispatch - tested in service
2000	Tritt: "Service-Management. Prozesse, Strukturen, Logistik"	Neural organization, motivation without pressure, exchange, cost chains
2009	Daniel Pink: "Drive"	Autonomy, mastery, purpose beat external incentives
2014	Frederic Laloux: "Reinventing Organizations"	Teal: self-managing teams, trust, evolutionary structures
2026	GoodPoints (goodpoints.de)	The service exchange as working software - for every organization

For fairness: Laloux and Pink themselves claim no first invention - they build on a long research tradition (Deci/Ryan, McGregor, Argyris and others). This article claims no dependence in any direction. It only documents: the same thoughts were described in 2000 independently of that - and from the daily routine of large service organizations - in a German professional book. Verifiable by ISBN.

Why it took 25 years

The book itself foresaw it (chapter "Einführung und Zukunft der Börsendisposition", from p. 210): the threshold for introducing the exchange was high. There were no benchmark partners. The risk of institutionalized self-dispatch was rated high. And: "The direct access, control and influence of managers on the service specialists is reduced under exchange-based dispatch."

Add to this the economic circumstance: the service business around the millennium still generated high profits - no suffering, therefore no desire for change.

What was missing were managers who are real leading personalities - curious enough to try things out instead of merely administering a job built on outdated procedures. For them, organizational development is not a threat to their influence, but a tool. Today, with skilled labor scarce and hierarchies running empty, the pressure exists - and the tools are available.

From the book to the software

What failed in 2000 at the technology step - distribution, transparency, real-time accounting - is solved today by web software: GoodPoints implements the book's service exchange: tasks with point values, self-selection instead of assignment, peer quality review (exactly like the "freely selectable control segments" of the neural organization), dynamic values when orders go unclaimed - and points that can remain private.

Concept: Dr.-Ing. Walter Tritt (KVD Service Management Award 1992) · Source: "Service-Management. Prozesse, Strukturen, Logistik", Langen/Müller 2000, ISBN 3-7844-7403-9 · This article was created with AI assistance as an extract from the book manuscript and approved by the author · More articles at goodpoints.de/wissen